X200 Ultra vs S25 Ultra

In 2025, the premium smartphone battle is heating up — and at the center are two powerhouses: the Vivo X200 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra. Both phones come armed with class-leading camera tech, flagship processors, and future-ready AI features. But which one truly leads the pack in real-world performance, photography, and value? In this detailed comparison of the Vivo X200 Ultra vs S25 Ultra, we’ll break down all key specifications, real-world usage, and which flagship is worth your money.

Vivo X200 Ultra vs S25 Ultra – Full Comparison Table

Vivo X200 Ultra vs S25 Ultra – Full Comparison Table

SpecVivo X200 UltraSamsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Launch DateApril 2025February 2025
Build & DesignGlass front/back, titanium frame, IP69K certifiedGlass front/back, titanium frame, IP68 certified
Display6.78″ LTPO AMOLED, 144Hz, 2K, 3000 nits6.8″ Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, 2K, 2600 nits
ProcessorSnapdragon 8 EliteSnapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy 
RAM & Storage12GB/16GB LPDDR5T, up to 1TB UFS 4.012GB LPDDR5X, up to 1TB UFS 4.0
Main Camera200MP wide (1-inch), 50MP ultra-wide, 50MP telephoto200MP wide, 50MP ultra-wide, 50MP 5x periscope
AI FeaturesVivo V3+ ISP, AI scene optimizer, AI zoom & portraitsGalaxy AI with Generative Edit, Instant Slow-mo
Selfie Camera50MP, autofocus, 4K video12MP, Dual Pixel AF, 4K video
Battery6000mAh, 90W wired, 50W wireless5000mAh, 45W wired, 15W wireless
SoftwareAndroid 15, Funtouch OS 15Android 15, One UI 7
Special FeaturesIn-house imaging chip, Super Night VideoGalaxy AI suite, S Pen (built-in)

Camera Comparison

Vivo X200 Ultra leads with a 1-inch 200MP sensor, V3+ ISP, and better low-light algorithms. It’s ideal for night photography, portraits, and cinematic 4K. The Samsung S25 Ultra, while offering sharper zoom thanks to its 5x periscope, slightly falls behind in sensor size and AI-assisted video clarity.

Verdict:
Vivo X200 Ultra wins for prosumers and photography enthusiasts.

Performance & Gaming

Both the Vivo X200 Ultra and Galaxy S25 Ultra are equipped with the latest Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset — branded as “for Galaxy” in the S25 Ultra. This ensures flagship-grade performance with blazing-fast app launches, buttery-smooth multitasking, and console-level gaming experiences.

Samsung’s custom optimization and thermal management give the S25 Ultra a slight edge in long gaming sessions and benchmark stability. Meanwhile, the Vivo X200 Ultra, with its lightweight software and efficient cooling, delivers excellent real-world performance with minimal throttling.

Verdict:
S25 Ultra offers better thermal control and gaming consistency. X200 Ultra matches in raw performance and excels in everyday responsiveness.

Battery & Charging

Vivo X200 Ultra offers 6000mAh with 90W fast charging and 50W wireless. It easily outpaces the 5000mAh, 45W wired setup of the S25 Ultra, which is still good, but less exciting in 2025.

Verdict:
Vivo X200 Ultra wins on charging speed and endurance.

Display Quality

Both phones offer top-tier 2K AMOLED displays, but Vivo hits 144Hz refresh rate with up to 3000 nits peak brightness. Samsung has the edge in color calibration and software optimization with HDR10+ and Dolby Vision tuned to perfection.

Verdict:
Draw – Vivo offers more brightness & refresh rate, Samsung is better tuning and overall display smoothness.

AI & Features

The S25 Ultra’s Galaxy AI offers advanced photo editing, instant slow-mo, and built-in S Pen features. Vivo counters with on-device AI for imaging, but lacks the broader ecosystem appeal.

Verdict:
S25 Ultra leads with deeper AI and productivity features.

Final Verdict – Which One to Buy?

If you’re focused on camera hardware, battery life, and fast charging, the Vivo X200 Ultra is the more aggressive performer in 2025. But for those who want a balanced flagship with great software, S Pen support, long-term updates, and refined AI tools, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is the smarter long-term bet.

FAQs – Vivo X200 Ultra vs S25 Ultra

Which phone has the better camera: Vivo X200 Ultra or Galaxy S25 Ultra?

The Vivo X200 Ultra leads with a massive 1-inch 200MP main sensor and advanced imaging thanks to its V3+ ISP. It excels in low-light photography and detailed shots. The S25 Ultra offers excellent versatility and telephoto zoom, but the X200 Ultra edges ahead in raw camera hardware.

Both are flagship powerhouses powered by the Snapdragon 8 Elite, ensuring exceptional performance, fast app launches, and smooth multitasking. However, Samsung’s software optimization and superior cooling system give the S25 Ultra an edge in sustained performance, especially during extended gaming sessions. The Vivo X200 Ultra, on the other hand, leverages its clean UI and efficient thermal management to deliver equally fluid gameplay and day-to-day responsiveness.

Vivo X200 Ultra wins hands-down with 90W wired and 50W wireless charging, compared to 45W wired and 15W wireless on the S25 Ultra.

The Galaxy S25 Ultra is the better productivity tool thanks to its built-in S Pen, One UI software ecosystem, and Galaxy AI features like real-time translation and note-taking.

Yes. The 6000mAh battery in the Vivo X200 Ultra lasts longer and charges faster than the 5000mAh battery in the Galaxy S25 Ultra.

Samsung Galaxy A36 vs Galaxy A56 – Full specs comparison

The Samsung Galaxy A36 vs Galaxy A56 battle is heating up in the mid-range smartphone segment. Both phones launched in March 2025 with similar designs and promises of flagship-grade features. However, when you look deeper, subtle differences in chipset, performance, and build quality start to matter. In this detailed comparison, we break down every spec side-by-side to help you make the right decision. Whether you care more about GPU power, software updates, or real-world battery endurance—this guide has you covered.

Samsung Galaxy A36 vs Samsung Galaxy A56
Samsung Galaxy A36 vs Samsung Galaxy A56

Galaxy A36 vs Galaxy A56 – Specs Comparison Table

SpecificationSamsung Galaxy A36Samsung Galaxy A56
NetworkGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5GGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G
Launch DateMarch 2, 2025 (Available from March 10)March 2, 2025 (Available from March 10)
Dimensions162.9 x 78.2 x 7.4 mm162.2 x 77.5 x 7.4 mm
Weight195 g198 g
BuildGlass front & back (Victus+), plastic frameGlass front & back (Victus+), aluminum frame
SIMDual SIM + eSIMDual SIM + eSIM
Water ResistanceIP67IP67
Display6.7″ Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 1900 nits peak6.7″ Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1900 nits peak
Resolution1080 × 2340 (~385 ppi)1080 × 2340 (~385 ppi)
ProtectionGorilla Glass Victus+, Mohs level 5Gorilla Glass Victus+, Mohs level 5
OS & UIAndroid 15, One UI 7, 6 major updatesAndroid 15, One UI 7, 6 major updates
ChipsetSnapdragon 6 Gen 3 (4nm)Exynos 1580 (4nm)
CPU4×2.4GHz + 4×1.8GHz1×2.9GHz + 3×2.6GHz + 4×1.9GHz
GPUAdreno 710Xclipse 540
RAM & StorageUp to 256GB/12GB, UFS 2.2Up to 256GB/12GB, UFS 3.1
Card SlotNoNo
Main Camera50MP + 8MP (Ultra-wide) + 5MP (Macro)50MP + 12MP (Ultra-wide) + 5MP (Macro)
Main Cam Video4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps
Selfie Camera12MP12MP
Selfie Video4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, 10-bit HDR4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 10-bit HDR
AudioStereo speakersStereo speakers
3.5mm JackNoNo
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 6
Bluetoothv5.4v5.3
PositioningGPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSSGPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS
NFCYes (market dependent)Yes (market dependent)
USBUSB-C 2.0, OTGUSB-C 2.0, OTG
SensorsIn-display fingerprint, gyro, compassIn-display fingerprint, gyro, compass
Special FeaturesCircle to SearchCircle to Search
Battery5000 mAh5000 mAh
Charging45W wired (66% in 30min, 100% in 68min)45W wired (65% in 30min, 100% in 68min)
ColorsLavender, Black, White, LimePink, Olive, Graphite, Light Gray
Price (INR)₹30,999₹38,999
AnTuTu (v10)613,492908,689
GeekBench (v6)29173899
3DMark (Wild Life Extreme)9121332
Max Display Brightness1233 nits1213 nits
Battery Life (Active Use)11h 38m12h 08m
EU Energy ClassCB
RepairabilityClass CClass C

Verdict

While both devices offer excellent value, Samsung Galaxy A56 clearly pulls ahead in a few key areas. Not only does it feature a faster and more efficient Exynos 1580 chipset, but it also comes with UFS 3.1 storage for quicker app loading and file transfers. The camera setup is slightly better too, especially the 12MP ultrawide lens, which captures sharper, wider shots. On the other hand, the Galaxy A36 is perfect for budget-conscious buyers who want a balanced experience without paying more.

In short, if performance and future-proofing are important to you, go for the Galaxy A56. However, if you’re happy with a reliable all-rounder at a lower price, the Galaxy A36 is still a solid pick.

FAQs

Q1. Which phone has better performance: Galaxy A36 or A56?

A: The Galaxy A56 has a better Exynos 1580 chipset and faster UFS 3.1 storage, resulting in noticeably higher benchmark scores.

A: Yes, if you prioritize performance, camera, and longevity, the Galaxy A56 offers a clear edge for the additional ₹8,000.

A: They have the same 6.7″ Super AMOLED panel, but the A56 adds HDR10+ support.