Samsung Galaxy S25 FE: Great Hardware, But Where’s the Flagship Soul?

The Galaxy S25 FE arrives as Samsung’s latest attempt to make flagship power more affordable — but this time, it feels like a balancing act that tips slightly off-center. While the phone refines nearly every design element from its predecessor and borrows high-end software features from the Galaxy S25 series, the question remains: does it still deserve the “Fan Edition” badge in 2025?

In this review, we’ll break down how the S25 FE performs in real-world use, where Samsung nailed it, and where it undercuts its own potential.

galaxy s25 fe

Design & Build: Slimmer, Lighter, and Still a Bit Stiff

There’s no denying Samsung worked on refinement this year. The Galaxy S25 FE is both slimmer (7.4 mm) and lighter (190 g) than the S24 FE, making it the slimmest Fan Edition yet. The device feels premium, with Gorilla Glass Victus Plus on both sides and an aluminum frame that mirrors the S25 lineup. It’s even IP68 rated, so dust and splashes are no worry.

But ergonomics still lag behind the aesthetics. Those flat edges and slightly sharp corners make the phone look classy yet feel less comfortable to grip for long sessions. The large 6.7-inch footprint doesn’t help either — this is still a two-handed phone for most users. So yes, it’s refined, but not necessarily easier to live with.

Display: Beautiful Colors, But Samsung Played It Too Safe

Samsung’s display heritage remains intact. The 6.7-inch FHD+ AMOLED panel produces vivid colors, deep blacks, and excellent brightness (up to 1900 nits) with HDR10+ and Vision Booster support. Streaming HDR videos on Netflix or YouTube looks fantastic, and the 120 Hz adaptive refresh rate makes UI navigation buttery smooth.

However, enthusiasts expecting a jump in resolution will be disappointed. The panel remains FHD+, not the sharper 1.5K or QHD+ resolution found on pricier models. While bezels are 26% thinner than last year’s, the slight “chin” remains — a small but noticeable asymmetry once you see it.

There’s also no confirmed PWM or DC dimming, which could bother flicker-sensitive users. In short: the display looks great, but Samsung’s decision to reuse old panel tech limits its wow factor.

galaxy s25 fe

Performance: Exynos 2400 Returns With Mixed Results

Powering the Galaxy S25 FE is Samsung’s Exynos 2400 chip — a solid performer on paper, but a controversial choice in late 2025. It’s the same silicon used in the S24 flagship line, and while it’s still fast, Samsung’s decision to skip the newer Exynos 2500 feels like a missed opportunity.

Everyday performance is smooth. App launches, scrolling, and multitasking run without hiccups, and the device scored around 2.1 million on AnTuTu, placing it in flagship territory. But sustained workloads reveal the compromises. Long gaming sessions with Genshin Impact or Call of Duty: Mobile expose thermal throttling, with CPU power dropping by nearly 50% during stress tests.

Samsung did include a 13% larger vapor chamber, but even that can’t fully contain the heat under extended pressure. This phone isn’t a gaming powerhouse — it’s a performance sprinter, not a marathon runner.

And the base 128 GB storage model (still UFS 3.1) feels stingy in 2025. You’ll need to pay more for the 256 GB UFS 4.0 variant to get proper flagship-level speeds. That alone makes the base model hard to recommend.

Software & AI: A Future-Proof Highlight

galaxy s25 fe

Here’s where Samsung truly delivers. The Galaxy S25 FE ships with One UI 8 on Android 16 and comes with seven years of OS and security updates — matching Google’s and Samsung’s flagship promises. That’s an industry-leading commitment for longevity.

You also get Samsung’s complete Galaxy AI suite, including Generative Edit, Circle to Search, Audio Eraser, and Instant Slow-Mo. The AI tools integrate neatly into the camera and gallery, and the Circle to Search feature is surprisingly useful during gameplay or browsing sessions.

Still, not everything clicks. Some AI extras like Daily Briefing and Summary Assist feel gimmicky or redundant. Samsung’s Game Booster also feels bare-bones compared to rival ecosystems like OxygenOS 14 or ColorOS. The software is excellent overall, but the “smart” features sometimes feel more like flashy additions than everyday essentials.

Camera System: Great Selfies, Mediocre Zoom

On paper, the Galaxy S25 FE’s triple camera setup mirrors its predecessor:

  • 50 MP main (OIS)

  • 12 MP ultra-wide

  • 8 MP 3× telephoto

  • 12 MP front camera (upgraded from 10 MP)

In real-world use, Samsung’s image tuning still favors bright, saturated results. Photos look instantly social-media-ready, with vibrant skies and punchy contrast. The Pro Visual Engine from the S25 series genuinely improves noise control and low-light detail.

However, the weaknesses are clear. The 8 MP telephoto is underwhelming — soft, noisy, and unreliable in dim lighting. It upscales shots to 12 MP, often producing fuzzy textures and lost detail. Portrait mode, while better than before, sometimes struggles with edge detection around hair or moving subjects.

The real improvement lies in the selfie department. The new 12 MP front sensor delivers crisp, balanced skin tones and excellent dynamic range — finally a selfie camera worthy of the FE badge.

Video capture remains strong across all sensors with 4K 60 fps and 8K 30 fps support, though thermal throttling can still impact long recording sessions.

Battery & Charging: Numbers Up, Real Gains Down

galaxy s25 fe

Samsung boosted the battery to 4900 mAh and added support for 45 W wired charging and 15 W Qi2 wireless. Sounds good on paper, right? Unfortunately, real-world results tell a different story.

Screen-on time averaged around 5 hours during heavy usage, similar to the S24 FE — not exactly an endurance upgrade. High-intensity gaming sessions drain it even faster, with just over three hours of playtime from a full charge.

And while the charger now supports 45 W, the actual charging time barely improved: about 70 minutes from 0–100%, matching last year’s 25 W performance. Add the fact that no charger comes in the box, and the battery story quickly loses its shine.

Verdict: The Galaxy S25 FE Is Polished — But Overpriced

41ZebXdzpeL. SL1000

There’s a lot to admire about the Galaxy S25 FE. It’s beautifully built, has a stunning display, improved selfies, and the best long-term software support in its class. In many ways, it’s Samsung’s most refined FE yet.

But when you weigh that against its Exynos-based performance, mediocre battery life, and stagnant charging speeds, it’s hard to ignore the cracks in the formula. At roughly £649 (₹60,000 approx.), it sits dangerously close to the Galaxy S25 Plus and faces fierce competition from better-performing rivals like the OnePlus 13R and Poco F7 Ultra.

In short, the Galaxy S25 FE is a good phone — just not a good deal. Unless Samsung discounts it heavily, most buyers will be better served by alternatives that offer more power or efficiency for the same money.

Galaxy S25 FE FAQs

1. Is the Galaxy S25 FE good for gaming?

It handles casual games well but struggles with sustained performance in heavy titles due to thermal throttling.

Yes, it supports 15 W Qi2 wireless charging, but charging speeds remain modest.

Expect around 5 hours of screen-on time under moderate to heavy use — average for its class.

Only if you find a strong discount. At its launch price, competitors offer better performance and battery endurance.

iPhone 17 Air: Ultra-Slim Marvel or Pricey Gimmick?

The iPhone 17 Air is Apple’s thinnest phone yet — gorgeous, featherlight, and full of compromises. Read our no-nonsense review before you buy.

iPhone 17 Air

iPhone 17 Air arrives as Apple’s bold bet on thinness: a record-slim 5.64 mm chassis, Grade-5 titanium frame, and a 6.5-inch Super Retina XDR display. It looks—and feels—like a design triumph. Yet the very choices that make the Air special also force hard trade-offs. This review cuts straight to what matters: what Apple gained, what it sacrificed, and why you should pause (several times) before pulling the trigger.

Design & durability — gorgeous, counterintuitively tough

61sK4bjgTmL. SX679 1backprofile

Apple nailed the look. The Air’s 5.64mm body and 165g weight feel almost unreal in the hand; it’s easily the most elegant iPhone for people who want a big screen without the bulk. Credit to the Grade-5 titanium frame and Ceramic Shield 2 front/back for keeping the phone from feeling fragile.

That said, thinness usually equals compromise. Apple solved flex and bending with clever structural engineering; reviewers found the handset surprisingly resistant to bending. Still: if you’re rough with phones, a case isn’t optional — it’s essential.

Think again if you use a phone without a case — the Air trips fewer alarms but still needs protection.

Display — bright, smooth, but a heavy hitter for battery

71qmq2lXNuL. SX679 1details

A 6.5-inch Super Retina XDR OLED with ProMotion 120Hz and peaks up to 3000 nits — this is a display that dazzles. Colors, contrast and outdoor visibility are flagship-level. The 120Hz experience is buttery and works well with the chip and UI.

But don’t forget the tradeoff: pushing 120Hz on a shallower battery is expensive. Apple tuned the software for efficiency, yet you will notice the drain under heavy use.

Ask yourself: Do you want the thinnest phone, even if that means fewer hours between charges?

Performance & thermals — Pro chip, constrained by physics

Inside sits the A19 Pro—a legitimately powerful SoC that promises Pro-grade performance. In light workloads it’s snappy and future-proof; in short bursts it can outperform many chips.

Where the Air stumbles is sustained load. Without the vapor-chamber cooling of the Pro models, the thin design forces the A19 Pro into thermal throttling under prolonged gaming or 4K recording. That means fast peak performance, followed by a noticeable drop while the phone cools.

Think again if you’re a heavy gamer or you edit video on the phone — the Air won’t hold top speeds for long.

Battery & charging — thinness bites back

Battery: 3,149 mAh (same as iPhone 16 Pro). Apple’s efficiency claims are real on light to moderate use, but real-world heavy use reports around 4.5–5 hours SOT — not great for a premium phone.

Charging is slower than the rest of the 17 family, and the MagSafe battery accessory (sold separately) is underwhelming given its heat loss and limited effective capacity.

Think again if you rely on long, unplugged days or travel frequently.

Audio — mono at a premium price

To save space, Apple removed the bottom speaker. The Air uses the earpiece as the sole speaker. It’s fine for voice calls and casual listening, but it’s not stereo, it lacks punch, and it’s a step down from most modern flagships.

Ask yourself: Will mono audio bother you while watching videos or playing games without headphones?

Camera — capable main, front is great, but wide is missing

71t3D5mhhiL. SX679 min1

Hardware:

  • Rear: single 48MP Fusion main camera (very good).

  • Front: 18MP Center Stage selfie camera (excellent, wide framing for video and vlogging).

  • No ultrawide. No telephoto.

The main camera takes solid photos in daylight. The selfie camera is impressive and brings real creative gain for vloggers and social video creators. But the absence of an ultrawide is a glaring omission: you can’t capture expansive landscapes or tight group shots without stepping back or doing awkward stitches. For many users that’s a deal-breaker.

Think again if you love landscape photography, group shots, or rely on multiple focal lengths.

Connectivity & practical limits

  • eSIM only — no physical SIM tray. That’s sleek but inconvenient for frequent SIM-swappers and travellers who use local physical SIMs.

  • USB-C present but limited to USB 2.0 speeds — another cost-cutting compromise that affects creators who transfer big video files often.

Ask yourself: Do you frequently swap SIMs or move large files? If yes, this could be a constant annoyance.

Pros & Cons — quick checklist

Pros

  • Stunning, ultra-slim design and featherweight feel

  • Premium materials (Grade-5 titanium, Ceramic Shield 2)

  • Fantastic selfie camera and bright 120Hz display

  • Good durability for a phone this thin

  • Ideal for users who prioritize portability

Cons

  • Weak battery for heavy users (≈4.5–5h SOT reported)

  • Thermal throttling under sustained load (no vapor chamber)

  • Mono speaker, reduced loudness and bass

  • No ultrawide or telephoto lens — limited versatility

  • eSIM-only and USB 2.0 transfer speeds

  • Expensive for the compromises it asks you to accept

Who should buy the iPhone 17 Air?

Buy it if:

  • You must have the lightest, thinnest flagship with a big screen.

  • You prioritise form factor above all — travel convenience, a phone that disappears in a pocket, or a lifestyle accessory.

  • You mainly consume content, take selfies, and tether often — and can charge frequently.

Don’t buy it if:

  • You’re a heavy gamer or mobile creator who needs sustained peak performance.

  • You need multiple focal lengths (ultrawide/telephoto) in a single phone.

  • You often swap physical SIMs or frequently offload large video files.

Think again — at least 5 times before buying:

  1. Think again if battery life and all-day uptime matter to you.

  2. Think again if you use your phone as a portable studio (telephoto/ultrawide needed).

  3. Think again if you often game or edit video on the phone — the thermal limits bite.

  4. Think again if you value stereo speakers and immersive sound when watching media.

  5. Think again if you regularly travel with physical SIMs or move large files — the eSIM and USB 2.0 limits will nag you.

Price & final take

Starting price: ₹1,19,900 (256GB) — or about $1,000 before taxes. That’s a lot for a phone that intentionally removes some features found on thicker counterparts.

If you want a statement piece and are willing to accept the trade-offs, the iPhone 17 Air delivers a magical pocket experience. If you want the best all-rounder for daily heavy use, cameras and battery, the iPhone 17 Pro / Pro Max or even the standard iPhone 17 are safer, more practical choices.

Final verdict: The iPhone 17 Air is a brilliant engineering exercise and a niche triumph — a phone that will delight a specific buyer profile. But for most users, it’s an expensive compromise disguised as innovation. Decide carefully.

Key specs (at a glance)

ItemiPhone 17 Air
Display6.5″ Super Retina XDR, OLED, 120Hz, up to 3000 nits
ChipsetA19 Pro
RAM(varies)
StorageStarts at 256GB
Rear camera48MP Fusion (single)
Front camera18MP Center Stage
Battery3,149 mAh
ChargingSlower than Pro models; MagSafe accessory available
SIMeSIM only
SpeakersSingle (earpiece) speaker — mono
PortUSB-C (USB 2.0 speeds)
Water resistanceIP68
Starting price (India)₹1,19,900 (256GB)

FAQs

Q: Is the iPhone 17 Air fragile because it’s so thin?

No — Apple’s materials and structure make it tougher than you’d expect. Still, use a case; thin phones are vulnerable to drops and dents.

It can — sustained heavy gaming causes thermal throttling and surface temperatures climb. Short sessions are fine; marathon sessions are not ideal.

No — it’s eSIM-only globally. This is convenient long term but inconvenient when swapping SIMs.

Not really. It helps in a pinch but is inefficient and expensive relative to wired powerbanks.

Choose the Air if portability, weight and that “featherlight” feel are your top priorities — and you accept the tradeoffs.